Best Attorney Time Tracker Apps in 2026
Compare the 10 best attorney time tracker apps in 2026. See pricing, features, Clio integration, and which tools actually work in courthouses, jails, and on the go.
Best Attorney Time Tracker Apps in 2026
You left the courthouse at 4:47 PM. You drove to the client meeting, which started at 5:15 and ended at 6:02. You spent twelve minutes on a call with opposing counsel on the way home. How much of that did you write down?
If you're like most attorneys, the answer is: not enough.
According to the Clio 2025 Legal Trends Report, attorneys capture only about 3 of every 8 hours they work. That means 5 hours of billable time vanish every single day — not because the work wasn't done, but because nobody logged it. Over a year, at a $300/hour rate, that's roughly $270,000 in revenue walking out the door.
The good news is that attorney time tracker apps have gotten dramatically better. The bad news is that most of them still weren't built with the reality of legal work in mind — the courthouse basements with no cell service, the back-to-back meetings where you can't pull out your phone, the end-of-day scramble to reconstruct what you did.
We reviewed 10 of the most popular attorney time tracker apps to help you find the right one. Here's what we looked at, what we found, and what matters most when you're choosing time tracking for lawyers.
What Makes a Great Attorney Time Tracker
Before we get into the reviews, let's talk about what actually matters. A generic time tracker works fine if you sit at a desk all day. But legal work happens everywhere, and the best attorney time trackers are built around that reality.
Here's what we evaluated each app on:
Mobile-first design. Most attorneys do at least some of their work away from a desk — in court, at depositions, in client meetings, in the car between appointments. If your time tracker requires you to be at your computer, it's already failing you during the hours that matter most.
Offline support. Courthouses, jails, and rural client locations often have zero cell service. If your app can't capture time offline and sync later, you're losing entries the moment you walk into a building with thick walls.
Matter matching. You handle dozens — maybe hundreds — of matters. A good time tracker should know which client and matter you're working on and suggest the right one automatically. Even better: it should show you why it matched, so you can confirm at a glance.
Approval workflow. You should review and approve every time entry before it hits your practice management system. Automatic sync sounds convenient, but it creates billing errors that are painful to fix after an invoice goes out.
Clio integration. If you use Clio, your time tracker needs to sync directly into Clio Matters — not through a workaround, not via CSV export, but natively. This is non-negotiable for most firms.
Security. Attorney time entries contain client information. Your tracker should encrypt data on the device, not just in transit. AES-256 encryption at rest is the minimum standard.
With those criteria in mind, let's look at the apps.
The 10 Best Attorney Time Tracker Apps in 2026
1. Lorla
Platforms: iOS (Android coming soon) Pricing: Free tier available; paid plans from $12/user/month Clio integration: Native, bidirectional sync
Lorla is built around a single insight: the hardest part of time tracking for lawyers isn't the tracking itself — it's remembering to start and stop a timer when you're in the middle of real work.
That's why Lorla lets you capture billable time from the lock screen and Dynamic Island. You finish a call, tap once on your lock screen, and the entry is logged with the client matter already matched. No unlocking your phone, no opening an app, no navigating menus.
The matter matching uses a confidence signal — it doesn't just guess which matter you were working on, it shows you why it matched (based on the contact, time of day, or other context), so you can confirm or correct it in a second.
Every entry goes through an approval step before syncing to Clio. You review your entries, make any adjustments, and push them when you're ready. Nothing goes to billing without your sign-off.
Lorla is offline-first, meaning it works in courthouse basements, jail visitation rooms, and anywhere else with no signal. Entries sync automatically when you're back online. All data is encrypted with AES-256 on the device.
Best for: Solo attorneys and small firms who need fast, accurate capture during a busy day and want every entry to flow cleanly into Clio.
Pros:
- Lock screen and Dynamic Island capture — no other app offers this
- Offline-first architecture works everywhere
- Matter match confidence signal shows the reasoning
- You approve every entry before sync
- AES-256 encryption on device
- Native Clio integration
Cons:
- iOS only (Android in development)
- Newer product, smaller community than legacy tools
2. CaseClock
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web Pricing: From $10/user/month Clio integration: Yes, via API sync
CaseClock is a straightforward legal time tracker with a clean mobile interface. It offers timer-based and manual time entry, matter selection from your Clio matter list, and basic reporting. The app is lightweight and easy to pick up, which makes it a solid choice for attorneys who want something simple.
Best for: Attorneys who want a no-frills timer app that syncs to Clio.
Pros:
- Simple, intuitive interface
- Cross-platform (iOS, Android, Web)
- Affordable pricing
Cons:
- No offline capture
- No lock screen or quick-capture feature
- Matter matching is manual — you select from a list each time
3. PointOne
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web Pricing: From $15/user/month Clio integration: Yes
PointOne focuses on GPS-based tracking. It uses your phone's location to detect when you arrive at and leave a client's office, the courthouse, or your firm. It then creates time entries based on those location events and lets you assign them to matters.
The concept is appealing for attorneys who travel frequently. In practice, GPS accuracy can be inconsistent — especially in urban areas or large buildings — and you still need to review and adjust entries manually.
Best for: Attorneys who drive between multiple client locations and want location-triggered entries.
Pros:
- Automatic location-based detection
- Good for attorneys with heavy travel schedules
- Cross-platform
Cons:
- GPS can be unreliable in buildings and dense urban areas
- Battery drain from continuous location tracking
- No lock screen capture
- Requires location permissions that some firms' IT policies restrict
4. Billables AI
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web Pricing: From $20/user/month Clio integration: Yes
Billables AI uses your phone's calendar, call log, and location data to automatically reconstruct your day and suggest time entries. It's one of the more ambitious approaches to passive time capture, and for attorneys whose days are structured around calendar events and phone calls, it can recover a meaningful amount of forgotten time.
The AI-generated entries need review — sometimes aggressively — because the matching isn't always accurate. A call with your spouse might get tagged as a client call. But the raw material it surfaces is often useful.
Best for: Attorneys who want passive capture and are willing to spend time reviewing AI-suggested entries.
Pros:
- Passive capture from calendar, calls, and location
- Can surface time you'd otherwise forget
- Cross-platform
Cons:
- Higher price point
- AI matching can be inaccurate
- Privacy concerns with access to call logs and calendar
- No lock screen capture
5. TimeSentry
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web Pricing: From $12/user/month Clio integration: Yes
TimeSentry is a legal-focused time tracker that emphasizes matter management alongside time capture. It lets you organize matters, set billing rates, and track time against budgets. The interface is functional but feels more utilitarian than the newer entrants on this list.
Best for: Small firms that want time tracking and basic matter management in one tool.
Pros:
- Combines time tracking with matter management
- Budget tracking against matters
- Cross-platform
Cons:
- Interface feels dated
- No quick-capture or lock screen feature
- Offline support is limited
6. Clio Native Timer
Platforms: Web (Clio browser app), iOS, Android (Clio mobile app) Pricing: Included with Clio subscription Clio integration: Native (it's Clio)
The built-in Clio timer is the path of least resistance if you're already a Clio user. You can start and stop timers directly in Clio, and entries land in the right matter automatically. The mobile app lets you log time from your phone.
The limitation is that it requires you to be actively thinking about time tracking. There's no lock screen shortcut, no passive capture, no smart matching. If you forget to start the timer — which, let's be honest, happens constantly — the time is gone.
Best for: Attorneys already deep in the Clio ecosystem who want zero additional tools.
Pros:
- No extra cost
- Entries go directly into Clio
- Available on mobile and web
Cons:
- No lock screen or quick-capture feature
- No offline-first design
- No matter matching intelligence — you must select the matter manually
- Easy to forget to start/stop
7. Toggl Track
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web, Mac, Windows, Linux Pricing: Free tier; paid from $10/user/month Clio integration: Via Zapier or third-party connectors
Toggl is one of the most popular general-purpose time trackers, and for good reason. It has a polished interface, cross-platform support, and robust reporting. It's not built for attorneys specifically, but many lawyers use it because it's reliable and well-designed.
The catch is Clio integration. Toggl doesn't sync to Clio natively — you need Zapier or a similar middleware, which adds complexity and potential points of failure. There's also no matter matching, no legal-specific workflow, and no approval step before entries reach your billing system.
Best for: Attorneys who want a polished general-purpose tracker and don't mind setting up third-party integrations.
Pros:
- Excellent, polished interface
- Cross-platform (every major OS)
- Strong reporting and analytics
- Generous free tier
Cons:
- No native Clio integration
- No legal-specific features (matter matching, approval workflow)
- No lock screen capture
- Not designed for legal workflows
8. Clockify
Platforms: iOS, Android, Web, Mac, Windows, Linux Pricing: Free tier; paid from $4.99/user/month Clio integration: Via Zapier or third-party connectors
Clockify is similar to Toggl in that it's a general-purpose tracker used by some attorneys. Its main advantage is price — the free tier is very generous, and even the paid plans are among the cheapest on this list.
Like Toggl, it lacks native Clio integration and legal-specific features. It's a fine tool if budget is the primary concern and you're willing to handle integration yourself.
Best for: Budget-conscious attorneys who need basic time tracking and can handle integration manually.
Pros:
- Very affordable
- Cross-platform
- Unlimited users on free tier
Cons:
- No native Clio integration
- No legal-specific features
- No offline-first design
- No lock screen capture
9. TimeSolv
Platforms: Web, iOS, Android Pricing: From $25/user/month (bundled with practice management) Clio integration: No — TimeSolv is its own practice management platform
TimeSolv is a full practice management suite that includes time tracking, billing, and trust accounting. If you're looking for an all-in-one platform and aren't already committed to Clio, TimeSolv's built-in time tracker is competent.
However, it's not a standalone time tracker. You buy into the whole TimeSolv ecosystem, and there's no Clio integration because TimeSolv is positioned as a Clio alternative.
Best for: Firms looking for a complete practice management platform with built-in time tracking.
Pros:
- All-in-one platform (time, billing, accounting)
- Established product with long track record
- Good reporting
Cons:
- Not a standalone time tracker — requires full TimeSolv subscription
- No Clio integration
- Higher price point
- No lock screen capture
10. WiseTime
Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, Mac, Windows Pricing: Custom pricing (enterprise-focused) Clio integration: Yes, native integration
WiseTime uses a passive approach: it runs on your computer and tracks which applications and websites you use, then groups that activity into time entries. It's designed for firms that want to capture time without requiring attorneys to manually start and stop timers.
The passive approach works well for desktop work but misses everything that happens away from the computer — court appearances, client meetings, phone calls. It also raises privacy questions, since it monitors application usage continuously.
Best for: Firms that want passive desktop-based time capture and have the budget for enterprise pricing.
Pros:
- Passive capture requires minimal attorney effort
- Native Clio integration
- Good for desktop-heavy work
Cons:
- Misses all non-desktop activity (court, meetings, calls)
- Enterprise pricing (not transparent)
- Privacy concerns with application monitoring
- No lock screen capture
Comparison Table
| App | Lock Screen Capture | Offline Support | Matter Matching | Clio Integration | Platforms | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorla | Yes (Dynamic Island too) | Yes (offline-first) | Yes, with confidence signal | Native | iOS | $12/user/mo |
| CaseClock | No | No | Manual | Yes (API) | iOS, Android, Web | $10/user/mo |
| PointOne | No | Limited | GPS-based | Yes | iOS, Android, Web | $15/user/mo |
| Billables AI | No | Limited | AI-based | Yes | iOS, Android, Web | $20/user/mo |
| TimeSentry | No | Limited | Manual | Yes | iOS, Android, Web | $12/user/mo |
| Clio Timer | No | No | Manual | Native | Web, iOS, Android | Included w/ Clio |
| Toggl | No | No | No | Via Zapier | All platforms | Free / $10/user/mo |
| Clockify | No | No | No | Via Zapier | All platforms | Free / $4.99/user/mo |
| TimeSolv | No | No | Manual | No (own platform) | Web, iOS, Android | $25/user/mo |
| WiseTime | No | No | Passive (desktop) | Native | Web, iOS, Android, Desktop | Custom |
How to Choose the Right Attorney Time Tracker
The right app depends on your practice and your biggest pain point.
If you forget to track time during busy days, look for lock screen capture or passive features. Lorla's lock screen and Dynamic Island capture is designed specifically for this — you log time the moment you finish an activity, without opening an app.
If you work in places with poor cell service, offline support is essential. Lorla's offline-first architecture means it works in courthouse basements and jail visitation rooms. Most other apps on this list require an active connection.
If you handle many matters and lose time switching between them, matter matching matters enormously. Lorla's confidence signal shows you why an entry matched a particular matter, so you can confirm or correct it instantly.
If you use Clio, prioritize native integration. Zapier-based connections work until they don't, and debugging sync issues at month-end is nobody's idea of a good time.
If you need cross-platform support (you work on Windows and want a desktop app), Toggl, Clockify, and WiseTime have the broadest platform coverage.
FAQ
What is the best time tracker for attorneys?
The best attorney time tracker is one you'll actually use consistently. Lorla is our top pick for its lock screen capture, offline-first design, and native Clio integration. For attorneys who need cross-platform desktop support, Toggl Track is a strong general-purpose alternative.
How much billable time do attorneys typically lose by not tracking?
According to the Clio 2025 Legal Trends Report, attorneys capture only about 3 of every 8 hours worked. That means roughly 5 hours per day — or over 1,200 hours per year — go unrecorded. At $300/hour, that's $360,000 in lost revenue annually.
Do attorney time trackers work without internet?
Most require an internet connection, but offline-first apps like Lorla are designed to work without one. This matters in courthouses, jails, and rural areas where cell service is unreliable. Entries sync automatically when you reconnect.
Can attorney time trackers sync directly to Clio?
Yes. Lorla, CaseClock, PointOne, Billables AI, TimeSentry, WiseTime, and Clio's own timer all offer native Clio integration. Toggl and Clockify require third-party connectors like Zapier, which adds complexity.
Are attorney time trackers secure enough for client data?
Look for apps that encrypt data on the device, not just in transit. Lorla uses AES-256 encryption at rest on the device. General-purpose trackers like Toggl and Clockify may not meet the same security standards required for legal client data.
Is it worth paying for a legal-specific time tracker?
If you use Clio and handle multiple matters, yes. Legal-specific trackers include matter matching, approval workflows, and native Clio sync that general-purpose tools lack. The time you recover from reduced forgotten entries typically pays for the subscription many times over.
Stop Losing Billable Hours
The math is simple. If you're not capturing at least 7 of every 8 hours you work, you're leaving money on the table — and a dedicated attorney time tracker is the fastest way to close that gap.
If you're ready to stop losing billable time, try Lorla free and see how much time you've been missing. It takes about two minutes to set up, connects to your Clio account, and starts capturing from your lock screen immediately.
Whether you choose Lorla or another tool on this list, the important thing is to start tracking consistently. Your future self — and your bottom line — will thank you.